Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The public and effective risk communication.

Lynn Frewer1

  • 1Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, University of Wageningen, Building no. 201, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen 6706 KN, The Netherlands. lynn.frewer@wur.nl

Toxicology Letters
|April 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing the Sus-Health Index: a combined measure for describing environmental impact and nutritive value of foods and meals.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

A value chain analysis of interventions to control production diseases in the intensive pig production sector.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Cognitive dissonance in food and nutrition-A review.

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition·2015
Same author

Health-related quality of life in food-allergic adults from eight European countries.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2014
Same author

Research for food and health in Europe: themes, needs and proposals.

Health research policy and systems·2011
Same author

Social and economic costs of food allergies in Europe: development of a questionnaire to measure costs and health utility.

Health services research·2009

Public risk perception, often dismissed as irrational, is driven by psychological factors, not just technical estimates. Effective risk management requires understanding and integrating public concerns into policy for better public trust and protection.

Area of Science:

  • Risk assessment and communication
  • Environmental psychology
  • Public policy

Background:

  • Public perceptions of risk are frequently disregarded by experts and policymakers, often labeled as irrational.
  • Traditional expert risk assessments do not adequately influence public behavior or address public concerns.
  • Societal priorities for risk mitigation may diverge from those identified by expert groups, leading to distrust.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of public perception in risk assessment and management.
  • To emphasize the psychological determinants of public responses to risk.
  • To advocate for the integration of public concerns into risk communication and policy-making.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the disconnect between expert risk estimates and public perception.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of psychological factors influencing risk perception.
  • Review of principles for effective risk communication.

    • Main Results:

    • Public risk perception is shaped by psychological factors, not solely technical data.
    • Effective risk communication requires addressing public concerns (e.g., environmental impact, health effects, vulnerable groups).
    • Acknowledging public concerns and expert disagreements fosters trust in regulatory processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding and incorporating public concerns is crucial for effective risk management strategies.
    • Dismissing public perceptions erodes trust in regulators and industry.
    • Risk communication must be transparent about uncertainties and expert disagreements.