Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of thresholds for carcinogenicity.

William J Waddell1

  • 1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, 14300 Rose Wycombe Lane, Prospect, KY 40059, USA. bwaddell@louisville.edu

Toxicology Letters
|April 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Carcinogenicity thresholds exist for chemicals, even those deemed Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). Animal studies indicate current human exposure levels for these compounds are safe, with thresholds far exceeding estimated daily intake.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Professor William J Waddell's letter concerning my paper entitled 'Long-term feeding effects of stevioside sweetener on some toxicological parameters of growing male rats'.

Journal of applied toxicology : JAT·2011
Same author

History of dose response.

The Journal of toxicological sciences·2010
Same author

Commentary on ''Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy''.

Human & experimental toxicology·2010
Same author

Letter to the editor regarding Bailey article.

Chemical research in toxicology·2009
Same author

Dose-response curves in chemical carcinogenesis.

Nonlinearity in biology, toxicology, medicine·2009
Same author

Thermodynamic basis for expressing dose logarithmically.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2008

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Chemical Safety
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Prominent studies like ED01 and N-nitrosodiethylamine re-evaluations indicate carcinogenicity thresholds.
  • Fifteen Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) compounds showed carcinogenicity in rodent studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate carcinogenicity thresholds of chemicals, including FEMA GRAS substances.
  • To compare animal study findings with human exposure levels for safety assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Applying fundamental chemistry principles to dose-response curves from high-dose animal studies.
  • Utilizing logarithmic scales for dose and linear scales for percent tumors.
  • Comparing established carcinogenicity thresholds with estimated human daily exposure levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Carcinogenicity thresholds were demonstrated to exist for tested compounds.
  • Tumor thresholds for FEMA GRAS flavors were significantly higher (several orders of magnitude) than estimated human daily doses.
  • Experimental animals appear more sensitive to carcinogenicity than humans.

Conclusions:

  • Animal studies, when properly analyzed, support the safety of current human exposure levels to flavors and other chemicals.
  • The findings suggest that FEMA GRAS substances are safe at typical human consumption levels.
  • Re-evaluation of toxicological data using chemical principles is crucial for accurate risk assessment.