Related Experiment Videos
Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal fractures: return to work and activity
1Section of Spine Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. mclainr@ccf.org
Spine
|April 20, 2004
Summary
Most spinal fracture patients treated with instrumentation return to work, with neurologic injury being the primary factor affecting functional recovery. Pain and occupation also influenced outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Trauma surgery
- Spinal cord injury research
Background:
- Limited data exists on the functional impact of surgical treatment for spinal fractures.
- Concerns include operative injury effects on muscle, motion segments, and instrumentation.
- Nonoperative care shows variable, hard-to-reproduce results with poorly documented functional outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report return to work and functional recovery in severely injured patients treated with segmental spinal instrumentation.
- To assess outcomes at a 5-year follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Seventy consecutive patients with unstable thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spine fractures treated with Cotrel Dubousset instrumentation were followed.
- Patients had high-energy trauma, with 38% polytraumatized and 56% with neurologic injuries.
- Functional recovery assessed via return to work, work level, and daily activity at a mean 5-year follow-up (n=62).
Main Results:
- 70% of patients returned to full-time work; 8% were capable of lighter work.
- 54% returned to previous employment without restrictions; 16% to full-time lighter jobs.
- Neurologic impairment strongly correlated with work status (P < 0.00005); pain and occupation also impacted outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Neurologic injury significantly impacts functional recovery more than surgical extent or instrumentation.
- Pain-related limitations often stemmed from radicular/neuropathic symptoms, not just back pain.
- Persistent back pain suggested correctable mechanical issues like sagittal imbalance or pseudarthrosis.