Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Application of a diagnostic decision rule in children with meningeal signs: a cost-minimization study
Rianne Oostenbrink1, Jan B Oostenbrink, Karel G M Moons
1Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.oostenbrink@erasmusme.nl
Insights
A new diagnostic rule for children with meningeal signs can reduce lumbar punctures and hospitalizations, leading to significant cost savings while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Decision Rules
- Health Economics
Background:
- Meningeal signs in children necessitate careful diagnosis and treatment.
- Current practices may lead to overuse of diagnostic and treatment procedures.
- A validated diagnostic rule can guide clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the cost savings of a newly developed diagnostic rule for children presenting with meningeal signs.
- To compare the rule's cost-effectiveness against current clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of routine care data from 360 children with meningeal signs (1988-1998).
- Cost estimation using financial accounts from academic and general pediatric hospitals.
- Comparison of actual procedures and costs versus rule-guided estimates.
Main Results:
- Application of the rule could decrease lumbar punctures by 12% and empirical treatment hospitalizations by 15%.
- Diagnostic accuracy remained equivalent to current practice.
- Estimated cost savings of Euro292 per patient (10% reduction), primarily from treatment costs.
Conclusions:
- The diagnostic decision rule offers potential for improved resource utilization in pediatric care.
- The rule demonstrates cost-effectiveness and can expedite the exclusion of bacterial meningitis.
- Implementation of the rule can enhance the management of children with meningeal signs.
Objectives:
Recently, we developed a diagnostic rule for the diagnosis and treatment of children with meningeal signs. This rule may provide the physician with a rationale to decide on the use of diagnostic and treatment procedures in these children and to improve their care. In this study, we estimated cost savings of the rule compared with current practice.
Methods:
Routine care data of 360 children visiting the emergency department of the Sophia Children's Hospital with meningeal signs between 1988 and 1998 were used. Costs of diagnostic tests and treatment were estimated by using financial accounts of an academic and a general pediatric hospital. The number of procedures actually performed and the resulting cost estimates (i.e. unit costs x volume) were compared with the estimated figures after application of the decision rule.
Results:
The population of children with meningeal signs comprised 99 with bacterial meningitis (27%), 36 with another serious bacterial infection (10%), and 225 with a self-limiting disease (63%). Application of the rule would reduce lumbar punctures by 12% and hospitalizations for empirical treatment by 15% with the same diagnostic accuracy as current practice. Cost savings were estimated at Euro292 per patient (relative reduction 10%) and were mainly achieved in the treatment course (Euro259).
Conclusions:
A diagnostic decision rule for children with meningeal signs has the potential to improve the appropriate use of medical resources, to be cost-effective, and to ascertain the absence of bacterial meningitis earlier.