Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile
Published on: September 20, 2024
Late-onset corneal haze and myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)
Irene C Kuo1, Salena M Lee, David G Hwang
1Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service of the Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. ickuo@jhmi.edu
Objective:
To report the incidence and clinical course of a series of patients who developed both delayed-onset, clinically significant progressive haze and myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Methods:
In this retrospective case series, the charts of 542 consecutive patients who had undergone PRK with the VISX Star Excimer or Nidek EC-5000 laser between July 1996 and October 1998 and who had a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. Ten eyes of 8 patients developed progressive haze to greater than 1+ and myopic regression equal to or more than -1 D 3 months or more after PRK. The historical and clinical features were reviewed.
Results:
The incidence of combined progressive haze and myopic regression was 1.8%. The average age was 40.5 years. Three of the 8 patients were female. The median spherical equivalent (SE) attempted correction was -6.69 D (range -4.00 to -12.25 D). Five patients who underwent bilateral PRK had unilateral involvement. The mean SE regression was -2.01 +/- 0.79 D (range -1.00 to -3.00 D). Regression plateaued at a mean of 9.8 months. Haze ranging up to 4+ peaked at a mean of 7.4 months. Topical steroid treatment and/or epithelial scraping was attempted in 3 eyes but was ineffective.
Conclusions:
Combined delayed-onset progressive haze and myopic regression can occur after PRK. In such cases, the amount of haze appears to correlate with the magnitude of attempted initial correction (r = 0.639, P = 0.046) although not with the magnitude of subsequent regression. Patients may need at least 10 months of follow-up to achieve a stable refraction and level of haze. These observations suggest a need for improved understanding of corneal wound healing following PRK and of biologic factors that may contribute to variability in outcomes.
