Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
Published on: March 31, 2022
Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals
1Kornhauser Health Sciences Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. mcatlas@louisville.edu
Purpose:
The purpose is to review the issue of retraction in the scientific literature and to examine the policies on retraction of major biomedical journals.
Method:
The historical background of this issue was investigated through a literature search. The Instructions to Authors of 122 major biomedical journals were reviewed for evidence of a policy on the retraction of articles. Editors of those journals with no mention of retraction in their Instructions to Authors were contacted by email and/or postal mail.
Results:
Sixty-two percent of the journals investigated did not post or report having a policy on issuing retractions. Only twenty-one (18%) did. The remainder did not post any policy and did not respond to inquiries.
Discussion:
Including policies in Instructions to Authors relating to the principled conduct of research and publication will improve the ethical environment in which the scientific community works.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Feedback Inhibition
The Retina
CRISPR
Viral Mutations
Cross-reactivity
