Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can differences in labor induction rates be explained by case mix?

J Christopher Glantz1, David S Guzick

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. chris_glantz@urmc.rochester.edu

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|April 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of a statewide bundle on obstetric hemorrhage in New York.

Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)·2025
Same author

Bleeding Through a Pandemic: Women's Lived Experiences with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

International journal of women's health·2025
Same author

The Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Disparities in Maternal Outcomes.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Pharmacy Benefit Managers in the Eye of the Storm: Growing Multipartite Scrutiny.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2024
Same author

The 'Invisible Hand' Doesn't Work for Prescription Drugs.

The American journal of medicine·2022
Same author

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Related Stress and Menstrual Changes.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2022

Hospital labor induction rates vary significantly, but patient factors (case mix) do not explain these differences. Case mix adjustment offers limited help in comparing hospital induction rates.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Labor induction rates exhibit considerable variation across healthcare facilities.
  • Understanding the drivers of these variations is crucial for quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if patient case mix differences explain variations in hospital labor induction rates.
  • To assess the utility of case mix adjustment in evaluating and comparing hospital induction rates.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a New York State birth certificate database for analysis.
  • Employed logistic regression to identify factors associated with labor induction.
  • Calculated expected induction rates based on case mix and compared them to observed rates across 16 hospitals.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The regional labor induction rate was 20.8%, with a 3.9-fold difference between the highest and lowest hospital rates.
  • Case mix adjustment explained only 12.6% of the observed variation in induction rates.
  • Risk adjustment minimally impacted the hospital rank ordering but improved clarity of individual rates.

Conclusions:

  • Patient case mix is not the primary driver of labor induction rate variations between hospitals.
  • Case mix adjustment can provide some benefit in interpreting and comparing hospital-specific labor induction rates.