Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
On mosaics and melting pots: conceptual considerations of comparison and matching strategies
Jacob A Burack1, Grace Iarocci, Tara D Flanagan
1Department of Educational Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1Y2. jake.burack@mcgill.ca
Abstract:
Conceptual and pragmatic issues relevant to the study of persons with autism are addressed within the context of comparison groups and matching strategies. We argue that no choice of comparison group or matching strategy is perfect, but rather needs to be determined by specific research objectives and theoretical questions. Thus, strategies can differ between studies in which the goal is to delineate developmental profiles and those in which the focus is the study of a specific aspect of functioning. We promote the notion of a "mosaic," rather than a "melting pot," approach to science in which researchers communicate conservative and precise interpretations of empirical findings.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Masonry
The process of building with masonry is hands-on and can be executed with basic tools. A...
Composite Masonry Walls
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Brick Masonry
For thicker walls, multiple wythes are bonded together using...
The Representativeness Heuristic

