Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing.

Andreas Lueschow1, Tilmann Sander, Stephan G Boehm

  • 1Neurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany. lueschow@zedat.fu-berlin.de

Psychophysiology
|April 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-trial assessment of gamma-frequency brain oscillations and their modulation using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

Brain stimulation·2026
Same author

An ultra-sensitive multi-channel MEG system for the non-invasive single-trial detection of cortical population spikes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study.

iScience·2026
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of the Multicultural Cognitive Examination (MCE) for detection of MCI and dementia in a diverse international cohort.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same author

Low-rank tensor decomposition for cross-bispectral analysis of EEG data.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same author

Optimizing OPM-MEG Sensor Layouts Using the Sequential Selection Algorithm with Simulated Sources and Individual Anatomy.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Visual search for faces is crucial. Attention selectively modulates face processing starting at 190 ms, significantly earlier than house processing (280 ms), indicating preferential access for faces in the brain.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Brain Imaging

Background:

  • Visual search, such as finding a face in a crowd, requires attention to be directed to specific perceptual categories.
  • The precise timing of when attention begins to selectively influence category-specific visual processing remains an open question.
  • Understanding attentional modulation is key to comprehending efficient visual information processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal dynamics of attentional modulation in category-selective visual processing using magnetoencephalography (MEG).
  • To determine when attention begins to influence the processing of faces versus houses in the human brain.
  • To explore whether attentional modulation occurs early in visual processing or results from later feedback mechanisms.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was employed to record brain activity from the right human occipitotemporal cortex.
  • Participants viewed images of faces and houses while their attention was manipulated.
  • Analysis focused on the time course of neural responses, specifically identifying face- and house-distinctive MEG signals and their modulation by attention.

Main Results:

  • A face-selective MEG response (M170) was observed between 160-170 ms, but attentional modulation of face processing began later, at 190 ms.
  • House-selective activity was also detected around 160-170 ms, but attentional modulation of house processing occurred significantly later, at 280 ms.
  • Attentional modulation of face processing was not attributed to feedback from later stages but reflected category-specific modulation in subsequent object processing.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional modulation of face processing begins approximately 90 ms earlier than that of house processing.
  • The brain grants preferential access to face stimuli during attentional modulation, suggesting a specialized processing pathway.
  • These findings highlight that category-specific visual processing is modulated by attention at later stages, not solely by early sensory responses.