Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Program running versus problem solving: mental task effect on tonic heart rate.

Tytus Sosnowski1, Beata Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz, Joanna Roguska

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Warsaw University, Poland. tytus@engram.psych.uw.edu.pl

Psychophysiology
|April 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Mental tasks requiring program running (RUN tasks) significantly increase tonic heart rate (HR) more than problem-solving (EDIT tasks). RUN tasks also showed greater phasic HR acceleration, indicating distinct physiological responses to cognitive demands.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does escaping a war zone feel worse than being there? War and coping by Ukrainian civilians in Ukraine and Poland.

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy·2025
Same author

[Chemerin as an early marker of metabolic syndrome].

Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism·2018
Same author

Patterns of brain and cardiovascular activation while solving rule-discovery and rule-application numeric tasks.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2017
Same author

Program running versus problem solving: two patterns of cardiac response.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2012
Same author

Mental task demands and cardiovascular response patterns.

Biological psychology·2010
Same author

RUN/EDIT information processing mode and phasic cardiac acceleration.

Psychophysiology·2008

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Human factors research

Background:

  • Understanding the physiological correlates of different cognitive task demands is crucial for optimizing performance and well-being.
  • Previous research suggests varying mental workloads elicit distinct autonomic responses.
  • Differentiating between task types based on their cognitive processes, such as execution versus problem-solving, may reveal specific patterns in cardiovascular activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether mental tasks involving program running (RUN tasks) elicit a greater tonic heart rate (HR) increase compared to tasks requiring problem-solving (EDIT tasks).
  • To compare the effects of RUN and EDIT tasks, matched for difficulty but differing in qualitative demands, on heart rate.
  • To examine differences in both tonic and phasic heart rate responses between these task types.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using verbal, numeric, and graphic materials.
  • Tasks were carefully matched for difficulty while varying in their core cognitive demands (RUN vs. EDIT).
  • Tonic and phasic heart rate (HR) changes were measured in response to task completion.

Main Results:

  • Across all experiments, RUN tasks consistently resulted in a greater tonic heart rate increase than EDIT tasks.
  • Specific examples include: filling missing letters (RUN) > finding word continuations (EDIT); arithmetic operations (RUN) > logical digit completion (EDIT).
  • Experiments 1 and 2 additionally demonstrated greater phasic heart rate acceleration during RUN tasks compared to EDIT tasks.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis that program running (RUN) mental tasks impose a greater physiological load, evidenced by increased tonic heart rate, than problem-solving (EDIT) tasks.
  • The results highlight distinct psychophysiological responses associated with different cognitive control mechanisms.
  • These insights have implications for designing tasks and understanding the physiological costs of cognitive effort in various domains.