Experiments on the nature of the signal that induces spinal neuroplastic changes following a peripheral lesion

This study aimed at identifying the signal(s) that elicit myositis-induced neuroplastic changes in background activity and responsiveness of spinal neurones. It is based on previous data suggesting that in dorsal horn neurones, responsiveness to peripheral input on one hand and background activity on the other are probably controlled by different mechanisms. In anaesthetized rats, myositis was induced in the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle and the activity of single dorsal horn neurones was recorded in segment L3. Impulse traffic and axoplasmatic transport in dorsal roots L4 and L5 were selectively blocked by lignocaine or vinblastine for various time periods relative to the induction of the myositis. The results show that the main triggering signal for the myositis-induced changes in both responsiveness and background activity is the altered impulse activity in primary afferent fibres. In contrast, 'no axonally transported chemical signal controlling the discharge behaviour of dorsal horn neurones was found. However, the time course of the electrical signals that cause the myositis-induced changes in background activity and responsiveness is different. For changes in responsiveness, a rather narrow time window of 2 h directly after induction of the myositis existed, during which the impulses from the inflamed muscle must reach the spinal cord. Accordingly, to prevent the increase in responsiveness, the electrical input had to be blocked during the first 2 h; a block of the same duration at another time had no effect. The change in background activity seems to be due to a continuous input from the inflamed muscle which adds up over the hours. Therefore, with regard to background activity, blocking the electrical signals is effective at any time, but only a block of long duration has a significant effect.