Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Published on: April 26, 2015
A comparison of high-dose and standard-dose epinephrine in children with cardiac arrest
Maria Beatriz M Perondi1, Amelia G Reis, Edison F Paiva
1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
High-dose epinephrine rescue therapy for pediatric cardiac arrest did not improve 24-hour survival rates. Standard-dose epinephrine appears more effective, suggesting high-dose therapy may be detrimental in pediatric resuscitation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
Background:
- Uncertainty exists regarding optimal epinephrine dosing for pediatric cardiac arrest.
- Standard-dose epinephrine is typically administered initially, but rescue dose efficacy is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose epinephrine as rescue therapy for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest.
- To determine the impact of rescue epinephrine dose on 24-hour survival and hospital discharge rates.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial involving 68 children with in-hospital cardiac arrest.
- Comparison of high-dose epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) with standard-dose epinephrine (0.01 mg/kg) after initial epinephrine failure.
- Primary outcome: survival 24 hours post-arrest, using Utstein-style reporting.
Main Results:
- 24-hour survival was lower in the high-dose group (1/34) compared to the standard-dose group (7/34).
- High-dose epinephrine was associated with increased odds of death (OR 8.6, P=0.05).
- No significant difference in return of spontaneous circulation; however, no patients in the high-dose group survived to discharge.
Conclusions:
- High-dose epinephrine rescue therapy offers no benefit for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest.
- Evidence suggests high-dose epinephrine may be associated with worse outcomes compared to standard-dose therapy.
Background:
When efforts to resuscitate a child after cardiac arrest are unsuccessful despite the administration of an initial dose of epinephrine, it is unclear whether the next dose of epinephrine (i.e., the rescue dose) should be the same (standard) dose or a higher dose.
Methods:
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to compare high-dose epinephrine (0.1 mg per kilogram of body weight) with standard-dose epinephrine (0.01 mg per kilogram) as rescue therapy for in-hospital cardiac arrest in children after failure of an initial, standard dose of epinephrine. The trial included 68 children, and Utstein-style reporting guidelines were used. The primary outcome measure was survival 24 hours after the arrest.
Results:
The rate of survival at 24 hours was lower in the group assigned to a high dose of epinephrine as rescue therapy than in the group assigned to a standard dose: 1 of the 34 patients in the high-dose group survived for 24 hours, as compared with 7 of the 34 patients in the standard-dose group (unadjusted odds ratio for death with the high dose, 8.6; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 397.0; P=0.05). After adjustment by multiple logistic-regression analysis for differences in the groups at the time of arrest, the high-dose group tended to have a lower 24-hour survival rate (odds ratio for death, 7.9; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 72.5; P=0.08). The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in terms of the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (which occurred in 20 patients in the high-dose group and 21 of those in the standard-dose group; odds ratio, 1.1; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 3.0). None of the patients in the high-dose group, as compared with four of those in the standard-dose group, survived to hospital discharge. Among the 30 patients whose cardiac arrest was precipitated by asphyxia, none of the 12 who were assigned to high-dose epinephrine were alive at 24 hours, as compared with 7 of the 18 who were assigned to a standard dose (P=0.02).
Conclusions:
We did not find any benefit of high-dose epinephrine rescue therapy for in-hospital cardiac arrest in children after failure of an initial standard dose of epinephrine. The data suggest that high-dose therapy may be worse than standard-dose therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Agonists: Therapeutic Uses
Emergency and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) applications: Pressor agents increase blood pressure, heart rate, and contractility in shock and organ failure situations. Dopamine can induce vasodilation and stimulate adrenoceptors. Endogenous catecholamines are effective in treating cardiogenic shock. α2-agonists like clonidine can reverse anesthesia-induced hypertension.
Allergies and...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

