Corneal concentrations following systemic administration of amphotericin B and its lipid preparations in a rabbit

David Goldblum1, Kaspar Rohrer, Beatrice E Frueh

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. david.goldblum@insel.ch

Ophthalmic Research
|April 23, 2004
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Systemic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) showed significantly higher corneal drug concentrations compared to conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in a rabbit model of fungal keratitis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Mycology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Amphotericin B (AmB) formulations are used for ocular fungal infections.
  • Topical application is standard for fungal keratitis, but systemic treatment is often combined for deep infections.
  • Corneal drug availability after systemic administration is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare corneal drug concentrations of systemic amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB), amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB).
  • To evaluate corneal penetration following systemic administration in a rabbit model.

Main Methods:

  • Rabbits with induced uveitis received daily intravenous doses of D-AmB, ABLC, or L-AmB for 7 days.
  • AmB concentrations in corneal tissue were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
  • Corneas were collected 24 hours after the final dose.

Main Results:

  • Mean corneal AmB concentrations were significantly higher with L-AmB treatment compared to ABLC and D-AmB.
  • L-AmB treatment resulted in mean corneal concentrations of 2.38 microg/g, while ABLC had <0.1 microg/g and D-AmB had 0.46 microg/g.
  • No AmB was detected in corneas of non-inflamed eyes.

Conclusions:

  • Systemic L-AmB demonstrates superior corneal penetration compared to D-AmB and ABLC in this rabbit model.
  • These findings suggest L-AmB may be a more effective systemic option for treating deep fungal keratitis.