Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

On the process for evaluating proposed new diagnostic EEG tests.

¹UCLA Department of Neurology.

Brain Topography

|January 1, 1992

Summary

New electroencephalogram (EEG) technologies require rigorous clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy. Many studies fail to meet standards, confusing scientific reports with formal efficacy trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2013

Same author

Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.

Neurology·2012

Same author

The US health care system: Part 1: Our current system.

Neurology·2008

Same author

Invited article: the US health care system: part 2: proposals for improvement and comparison to other systems.

Neurology·2008

Same author

Continuous ICU EEG monitoring.

Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology·2003

Same author

Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midline shift and outcome.

Neurology·2003

Area of Science:

Medical Technology Assessment
Clinical Electrophysiology
Diagnostic Test Evaluation

Background:

New medical technologies, including electroencephalogram (EEG) advancements, necessitate thorough safety and efficacy assessments.
Clinical application of novel technologies should be restricted until robust evidence of their performance is established.
Scientific literature often lacks the rigor required for formal clinical trials of new diagnostic tools.

Framework:

Standardized procedures for assessing EEG technology efficacy are based on controlled clinical studies.
Distinguishing between informal case series and formal clinical trials is crucial for accurate technology appraisal.
Discriminant analysis can aid in evaluating the clinical utility of diagnostic tests presented in scientific reports.

Implementation:

Many published studies on new EEG technology do not adhere to traditional clinical trial standards.
A common issue is the conflation of preliminary scientific findings with definitive efficacy data.
Examples from the 1991 ISBET symposium illustrate challenges in assessing diagnostic test performance.

Implications:

Clearer guidelines are needed to differentiate scientific reporting from formal clinical efficacy trials for new EEG technologies.
Improved methodologies in study design and reporting are essential for reliable assessment of medical innovations.
Accurate evaluation of new EEG technologies ensures patient safety and optimizes clinical decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos