Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Blank paper or printed set task forms for retrievable patient notes?

G D Wood1, N D Rhodes

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral, Merseyside.

The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The future of oral and maxillofacial surgery - retired viewpoint.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

New specialty?

British dental journal·2019
Same author

Dental regulation: In conflict with the GMC.

British dental journal·2015
Same author

A new model for demonstrating enamel protection benefits relative to acid challenge.

The Journal of clinical dentistry·2013
Same author

Scant evidence.

British dental journal·2013
Same author

Potentially disastrous.

British dental journal·2012
Same journal

Intralesional corticosteroid injections in single-system Langerhans cell histiocytosis with maxillomandibular involvement: a systematic review.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Obituary: Mr Ian Cliffe Martin.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

In reply to the Letter to Editor regarding "Novel electromagnetic-navigated maxillary repositioning system for Le Fort I osteotomy: preclinical evaluation".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Long-term outcomes after level II/III temporomandibular joint arthroscopy for temporomandibular dysfunction: results from a five-year follow-up study".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: "Novel electromagnetic-navigated maxillary repositioning system for Le Fort I osteotomy: preclinical evaluation".

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

AI-powered virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Structured documentation for third molar removal reviews significantly improves record quality. Preselected task forms provide superior, consistent, and retrievable clinical notes compared to blank paper documentation.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Medical Record Keeping
  • Clinical Documentation

Background:

  • Review appointments after third molar removal under general anesthesia are crucial for patient follow-up.
  • Current methods of clinical note-taking may lack consistency and retrievability.
  • Standardizing documentation can enhance the quality of patient records.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the quality of clinical notes generated from patient reviews following third molar extraction.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of preselected task forms versus blank paper for recording clinical findings.
  • To determine if a structured approach improves record quality and retrievability.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical notes from review appointments of patients undergoing third molar removal were collected from five Mersey Hospitals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two documentation methods were compared: standard notes on blank paper and notes recorded using preselected task forms.
  • Records were assessed for quality, consistency, and retrievability.

    • Main Results:

    • Preselected task forms consistently yielded high-quality retrievable records.
    • Documentation using preselected task forms was found to be superior to notes recorded on blank paper.
    • The structured approach facilitated more effective data capture and organization.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing preselected task forms for clinical notes following third molar removal enhances record quality.
    • Structured documentation methods are more effective for achieving consistent and retrievable patient records.
    • This approach offers a significant improvement over traditional blank paper note-taking in surgical reviews.