Related Experiment Videos
Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules
Frances K McSweeney1, Eric S Murphy, Benjamin P Kowal
1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA. fkmcs@mail.wsu.edu
Behavioural Processes
|April 28, 2004
Summary
Changes in reinforcer habituation influence behavioral interactions in pigeons and rats under multiple schedules. Modifying reinforcer duration disrupted habituation, increasing response rates, especially with high reinforcement frequencies.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Animal behavior
- Operant conditioning
Background:
- Behavioral interactions in multiple schedules are not fully understood.
- Habituation to reinforcers may play a role in these interactions.
- Previous research has not fully explored the impact of reinforcer changes on habituation and subsequent behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that changes in habituation to reinforcers contribute to behavioral interactions.
- To investigate whether altering reinforcer characteristics disrupts habituation and induces behavioral interactions.
- To examine the role of reinforcement rate and variability in these phenomena.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons and rats were trained on multiple variable interval-variable interval schedules.
- Variability was introduced into the duration of reinforcers in one component of the schedule.
- Response rates in both components were monitored under conditions of fixed and variable reinforcer durations.
Main Results:
- Introducing variability in reinforcer duration increased response rates in both schedule components when reinforcement rates were high, but not low.
- The magnitude of increased response rates in the constant-component schedule grew over the session.
- Within-session decreases in responding were less pronounced when the other component offered variable-duration reinforcers compared to fixed-duration reinforcers.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the idea that changes in reinforcer habituation contribute to behavioral interactions.
- These results offer an explanation for why behavioral interactions occur in some subjects but not others.
- The study challenges the assumption that induction and behavioral contrast are always mediated by distinct theoretical mechanisms.