A new poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit possesses superior platelet preservation and inflammatory suppression efficacy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026
Artificial Lung Device Priming for In Situ Fiber Bundle Surface Grafting
Published on: March 28, 2025
Takeshi Ikuta1, Hiromichi Fujii, Toshihiko Shibata
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. nama@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Background:
Poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several studies have revealed that PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have good biocompatibility. This study sought to compare this biocompatibility with those of heparin-coated and noncoated circuits.
Methods:
Forty-five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to PMEA-coated (group P, n = 15), heparin-coated (group H, n = 15), or noncoated (group N, n = 15) circuit groups. Clinical data and the following markers were analyzed: (1) platelet preservation by number of platelets; (2) complement (C) activation by C3a and C4a levels; (3) inflammatory response by interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels.
Results:
Platelet numbers were significantly preserved in group P compared with groups N and H. Postoperative blood loss did not differ among the groups. During CPB, C3a values were significantly lower in group H (536 +/- 145 ng/mL) than in group P (1,458 +/- 433 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and group N (1,815 +/- 845 ng/mL, p < 0.01). The C4a values did not differ 60 minutes after CPB initiation among the groups. The IL-6 and IL-8 levels were significantly lower in group P and group H than in group N.
Conclusions:
The PMEA coating was superior to heparin coating and noncoating in preserving platelets, and was equivalent to heparin coating in terms of the perioperative clinical course and inhibition of inflammatory cytokines, but slightly inferior in reducing complement activation.
