Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Intranasal Delivery of mRNA Polyplexes via Rayleigh Breakup Aerosols: An In Vitro Method for Nasal Deposition and Functional Testing
Published on: January 20, 2026
Bioavailability of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate aqueous nasal sprays
P T Daley-Yates1, R L Kunka, Y Yin
1GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacology and Discovery Medicine, Greenford Road, UB6 0HE Greenford, Middlesex, UK. Peter.T.Daley-Yates@gsk.com
Objectives:
To compare the systemic exposure for intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal sprays (ANS) in terms of serum and urinary cortisol parameters and plasma pharmacokinetics.
Methods:
Twelve healthy subjects completed this three-way, cross-over study. They received FPANS (50 microg/spray), MFANS (50 microg/spray) or placebo ANS, eight sprays per nostril every 8 h for 4 days. Cortisol measurements were made at baseline and day 4. FP and MF plasma concentrations were also measured on day 4.
Results:
MFANS produced similar mean plasma AUC (123 pmol/l h) to FPANS (112 pmol/l h). Despite the use of high doses, necessary to generate adequate pharmacokinetic data, only minor reductions in cortisol parameters were found, with no difference between FPANS and MFANS.
Conclusions:
FP and MF have similar and very low systemic bioavailability when administered intranasally using a high-dose regimen. It is therefore unlikely that therapeutic doses of intranasal FP or MF will produce dissimilar or significant degrees of systemic exposure or systemic effects.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Bioavailability
Bioavailability: Overview
Bioavailability: Overview
Non-Oral Extravascular Drug Absorption Routes
Lipophilic drugs that are stable at salivary pH (6) and exhibit minimal binding to the oral mucosa are absorbed more effectively...
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors
