Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Robert L Sainburg1, Sydney Y Schaefer

  • 1Dept. of Kinesiology, Penn State University, 266 Recreation Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA. rls45@psu.edu

Journal of Neurophysiology
|April 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Where Would You Stimulate?" Beliefs About Anatomical Relevance for Enhancing Motor Performance With Non-Invasive Electrical Stimulation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

Examining the decision to take a dementia risk test: Considerations for privacy in screening at-home.

Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders·2026
Same author

Performance-based assessments of cognition are less susceptible to demographic effects than traditional memory tests: Evidence from MindCrowd.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation reveals a specific role for posterior parietal cortex in interlimb generalization.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Targeted Remediation of the Ipsilesional Arm in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same author

Standardizing the Measurement and Definition of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2025

This study reveals distinct interlimb strategies for controlling movement extent. The dominant arm uses preplanning (pulse-height control), while the nondominant arm relies on sensory feedback (pulse-width control).

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Biomechanics
  • Human movement science

Background:

  • Interlimb asymmetries in motor control are common.
  • Understanding limb-specific strategies for movement extent is crucial for rehabilitation and performance enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in movement extent control between dominant and nondominant arms.
  • To identify the underlying control mechanisms (e.g., preplanning vs. feedback) used by each limb.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed repetitive single-joint elbow extension movements with both arms.
  • Movements were executed towards four target distances on a frictionless air-jet system.
  • Peak velocity, acceleration, and movement accuracy were analyzed for each arm across trials.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Peak hand velocity scaled linearly with movement distance for both arms.
  • No significant differences in peak velocities or movement accuracies were found between the arms.
  • Dominant arm control relied on varying peak acceleration (pulse-height), while nondominant arm control varied acceleration impulse duration (pulse-width).

Conclusions:

  • Limb dominance influences the motor control strategies employed for regulating movement extent.
  • The dominant arm utilizes preplanning (pulse-height control), whereas the nondominant arm relies more on sensory feedback (pulse-width control).
  • These findings highlight distinct neural mechanisms underlying motor control in human limbs.