Related Experiment Videos
Factors affecting quantitative analysis in laser desorption/laser ionization mass spectrometry
Jamie E Elsila1, Nathalie P de Leon, Richard N Zare
1Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5080, USA.
Analytical Chemistry
|May 1, 2004
Summary
Quantitative microprobe laser desorption/laser ionization mass spectrometry (microL(2)MS) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is challenged by laser parameters and alignment. These factors significantly affect analyte ratios, impacting reproducibility in trace organic compound detection.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Mass Spectrometry
- Organic Geochemistry
Background:
- Microprobe laser desorption/laser ionization mass spectrometry (microL(2)MS) is a sensitive technique for detecting trace organic compounds, especially polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
- Current research aims to establish microL(2)MS as a quantitative method, typically using internal standards to measure analyte signal ratios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors influencing signal ratios in quantitative microL(2)MS.
- To identify sources of uncertainty and irreproducibility in the quantification of PAHs using microL(2)MS.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of signal ratios of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using microprobe laser desorption/laser ionization mass spectrometry (microL(2)MS).
- Systematic variation of desorption laser power and wavelength, desorption-ionization delay time, ionization laser power, and ionization laser alignment.
- Testing on synthetic poly(vinyl chloride) membranes and Murchison meteorite powder samples.
Main Results:
- Desorption laser parameters and delay time significantly altered PAH signal ratios (up to 24-fold).
- Ionization laser power and alignment presented practical challenges for reproducible quantification due to their sensitivity and difficulty in control.
- Ratios varied more between dissimilar PAHs than between similar ones, suggesting the need for multiple internal standards for diverse PAH mixtures.
Conclusions:
- Precise control over laser desorption/ionization parameters is critical for accurate and reproducible quantitative microL(2)MS.
- Ionization laser power and alignment are key limitations for quantitative microL(2)MS, demanding careful optimization.
- Quantifying diverse PAH mixtures may require multiple internal standards to account for variations in signal response.