Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The rating reliability calculator.

David J Solomon1

  • 1Office of Medical Education Research and Development and the Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. dsolomon@msu.edu

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|May 1, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiographic Severity and Clinical Implications of Knee Osteoarthritis in Adults Under 55: Incidence and Insight Into Potential Candidates for Geniculate Artery Embolisation.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Can the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score Predict Total Hip Replacement Versus Hemiarthroplasty Candidates?

Cureus·2025
Same author

A Minimally Invasive Approach to Caecal Volvulus: A Rare Complication of Colonoscopy.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Patient Impact of Surgery Abroad: A Retrospective Qualitative Analysis.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Assessing the growth in clinical skills using a progress clinical skills examination.

PeerJ·2020
Same author

Attendance, engagement and performance in a medical school curriculum: early findings from competency-based progress testing in a new medical school curriculum.

PeerJ·2018
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

An interpretable XGboost algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis using routine biomarkers.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a web-based tool for calculating rating scale reliability using Ebel's algorithm, even with incomplete data. The utility provides key statistics, simplifying reliability analysis for researchers without requiring complete datasets.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Software Development

Background:

  • Rating scales are crucial for evaluation data, making reliability assessment critical for decision-making.
  • Traditional reliability methods often require complete datasets, posing challenges in practical research scenarios.
  • Ebel's algorithm offers a solution for incomplete rating data, but accessible software has been lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a user-friendly, web-based utility for estimating rating reliability using Ebel's algorithm.
  • To provide researchers with a tool to analyze incomplete rating data efficiently.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a web-based utility using PHP, freely available under GNU General Public License.
  • The tool allows users to upload rating data from their computers for server-side analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implements Ebel's algorithm for reliability estimation with incomplete data.

    • Main Results:

    • The utility calculates and displays reliability estimates, number of subjects rated, and harmonic mean of judges per subject.
    • Provides mean and standard deviation for averaged ratings per subject.
    • Offers mean, standard deviation, and number of ratings per subject, plus Spearman-Brown prophecy formula estimates.

    Conclusions:

    • The web-based program offers a convenient method for estimating rating reliability from incomplete data.
    • Eliminates the need for special studies to collect complete rating datasets.
    • Encourages further research and enhancements to the developed program.