Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026
Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Technical aspects and results of surgery for craniosynostosis
H Haberl1, B Hell, M J K Zöckler
1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Medical School, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Insights
Craniosynostosis surgery in infants yielded satisfactory results in 82% of cases within the first year. Adapting surgical techniques to individual malformations is crucial for optimal outcomes in pediatric craniosynostosis management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurosurgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Craniosynostosis management involves ongoing debate regarding optimal surgical timing and extent.
- Accurate diagnosis is essential, as some suspected cases may have other origins or mild manifestations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of surgical interventions for craniosynostosis in a pediatric cohort.
- To identify factors influencing surgical success and areas for technique improvement.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 159 children with suspected craniosynostosis (1996-2000).
- Surgical indications were established in 53% of cases; 83 underwent remodeling between 4-12 months.
- Analysis included demographic data, clinical follow-up, and photographic documentation.
Main Results:
- Satisfactory outcomes were achieved in 82% of cases after a mean follow-up of 3 years and 8 months.
- 18% experienced limited improvement, with some requiring reoperation due to insufficient hemostasis or secondary correction loss.
- No significant outcome difference was observed for sagittal synostosis surgery performed before or after 6 months of age.
Conclusions:
- Overall surgical results for craniosynostosis within the first year of life are satisfactory (82%).
- Individualized adaptation of surgical techniques is vital to prevent unfavorable results.
- A novel modular system for skull modeling is proposed to enhance surgical precision over freehand remodeling.
Background:
The timing and extent of surgery continue to be a matter of discussion in current craniosynostosis management.
Patients And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the first 159 children seen from 1996 to 2000 of a total of 243 patients presenting with suspected craniosynostosis. We did not establish a surgical indication in 74 children (47%), either because their malformations were of different origin without associated craniosynostosis (11/7%) or they presented with only mild clinical manifestations of sutural synostosis (63/40%). In 85 cases (53%), we established a surgical indication. Parents did not follow our recommendation in two cases (1%). In 83 cases, we performed diagnosis-related remodeling at the age of 4-12 months. Demographic data, clinical follow-up findings, and regular photo documentation were analyzed.
Results:
After a mean follow-up of 3 years and 8 months, the results were satisfactory in 68 cases (82%). Of 15 cases (18%) with only limited improvement, two children were submitted to a second intervention. Another two children had to be reoperated on immediately for insufficient hemostasis. In the largest subgroup of children (47) with sagittal synostosis, there was no difference in outcome between surgery performed before and after 6 months of age.
Discussion:
Surgical indication and assessment of results are based on subjective criteria which limit the comparison with the literature. Our results correspond to those of similar published series. Most of the unfavorable results could be attributed either to inadequate adaptation of the surgical technique to the individual form of the malformation or to a significant secondary loss of correction in multi-sutural synostosis.
Conclusions:
The overall results of surgery within the first year of life were satisfactory in 82%. Standard procedures need to be adapted carefully to the individual form of craniosynostosis to avoid unfavorable results. We therefore propose a new surgical technique based on a statistically averaged modular system of skull models to replace freehand remodeling.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:14Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
01:27Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...