Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction
Richard J Shaw1, A N Kanatas, Derek Lowe
1Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, UK, L9 7AL. richardjohnshaw@hotmail.com
Background:
The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal.
Results:
In the series, 49% of patients received miniplates, and 51% received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27%) and those with reconstruction plates (30%). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatment, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39%) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy.
Conclusions:
No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.
