Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
[From a hypothesis to dietary advice--roads, short cuts and dead-end roads]
Helle Margrete Meltzer1, Haakon E Meyer, Knut-Inge Klepp
1Avdeling for naeringsmiddeltoksikologi, Divisjon for miljømedisin, Nasjonalt folkehelseinstitutt, Oslo. helle.margrete.meltzer@fhi.no
Abstract:
Few scientific fields receive more public attention than food and nutrition and few have more self-proclaimed experts. Many are confused by the jungle of dietary advice, sometimes widely differing, with the media often giving broad attention to isolated results without assessing them in the context of the total body of knowledge within a field. A new hypothesis may be received with enthusiasm by lay people and professionals alike, but the road to a well-documented conclusion on which to build general advice, is most often long. A finding must be seen in the context of other findings and judged in relation to the whole body of theory within a field before conclusions can be drawn. Work is carried out both nationally and internationally in order to reach a shared understanding of the minimum requirements of documentation before advice can be given. Traditional guidelines for evidence-based medicine can be applied to some but not all aspects of the science of nutrition. This article presents the process leading to official dietary guidelines in Norway.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Optimal Foraging
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Confirmation Biases
The Scientific Method
Social Traps

