Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Normal linear models with genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity: a case study.

Daniel Sorensen1, Rasmus Waagepetersen

  • 1Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Tjele. sorensen@inet.uni2.dk

Genetical Research
|May 12, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Tutorial on Improving RCT Power Using Prognostic Score Adjustment for Linear Models.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Composite likelihood inference for space-time point processes.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Compositionally aware estimation of cross-correlations for microbiome data.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Nitrogen and Nod factor signaling determine Lotus japonicus root exudate composition and bacterial assembly.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

How Precisely Can Easily Accessible Variables Predict Achilles and Patellar Tendon Forces during Running?

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

TOWARD BAYESIAN INFERENCE OF THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROTEINS FROM THREE-CUBE FÖRSTER RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER DATA.

The annals of applied statistics·2018
Same journal

Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Proper experimental design and sound statistical inference win every time: a commentary on 'Statistical design and the analysis of gene expression microarray data' by M. Kathleen Kerr and Gary A. Churchill.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Wild populations are smaller than we think: a commentary on 'Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review' by Richard Frankham.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times.

Genetical research·2008
Same journal

Identity and coalescence in structured populations: a commentary on 'Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times' by Montgomery Slatkin.

Genetical research·2008
See all related articles

Researchers analyzed pig litter size data using mixed models to understand genetic factors influencing litter size and residual variance. Models with genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity were favored, suggesting a negative correlation between genes for litter size and variance.

Area of Science:

  • Animal breeding and genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Quantitative genetics

Background:

  • Understanding factors affecting pig litter size is crucial for efficient livestock breeding.
  • Residual variance heterogeneity can impact genetic evaluations and selection decisions.
  • Mixed models are standard tools for analyzing animal breeding data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare normal mixed models with varying levels of residual variance heterogeneity for pig litter size data.
  • To assess the impact of genetically structured residual variance on model performance.
  • To evaluate models for prediction, inference on selection response, and candidate ranking.

Main Methods:

  • Fitting normal mixed models with different residual variance heterogeneity structures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing posterior predictive distributions for model assessment.
  • Employing Bayes factors and related criteria for model comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • Models incorporating genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity were favored over simpler models.
    • Strong evidence suggests a negative correlation between additive genetic values for litter size and residual variance.
    • The chosen models showed better performance in predicting future data and ranking selection candidates.

    Conclusions:

    • Genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity is important for accurate modeling of pig litter size.
    • The negative correlation has implications for predicting selection response and optimizing breeding strategies.
    • These findings can inform the development of more effective animal breeding programs.