Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Subretinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Tissue in a Feline Large Animal Model
Published on: August 5, 2021
Whole blood transfusions in 91 cats: a clinical evaluation
1Clinic for Small Animals, Free University of Berlin, Oertzenweg 19b, D-14163 Berlin, Germany.
Insights
Feline blood transfusions are effective and safe when using compatible blood and proper screening. This study found that cat transfusions improved survival rates with minimal reactions, highlighting the importance of careful donor selection.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Hematology
Background:
- Feline transfusion practices require evaluation for safety and efficacy.
- Understanding transfusion indications and outcomes in cats is crucial for veterinary care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess feline transfusion practices, including patient demographics, indications, efficacy, and adverse reactions.
- To determine the survival rates and safety of blood transfusions in cats.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective survey of feline transfusions at the University of Berlin (1998-2001).
- Analysis of blood donor characteristics, transfusion indications, compatibility testing, and patient outcomes.
- Evaluation of survival rates at 1 and 10 days post-transfusion.
Main Results:
- 91 cats received transfusions for various conditions including anemia and hypoproteinemia.
- Survival rates at 1 and 10 days post-transfusion were 84% and 64%, respectively.
- Major crossmatch incompatibility occurred in 8 cats, with minimal transfusion reactions noted in only two cats.
Conclusions:
- Proper donor selection and compatibility screening are essential for safe and effective feline blood transfusions.
- Blood transfusions in cats are well-tolerated and can improve survival rates.
- Transfusion reactions are infrequent when appropriate screening protocols are followed.
Abstract:
This survey assessed the feline transfusion practices at the University of Berlin from 1998 to 2001 in regard to patient population, indications, efficacy, and transfusion reactions. Blood was obtained from seven healthy in-house donors and 127 mostly indoor client-owned pet cats. Over a 3-year period 91 cats were transfused with blood type compatible blood. The blood was fresh (within 8 h of collection) or stored no longer than 15 days. Transfusions were required because of blood loss anaemia (n=40), haemolytic anaemia (n=13), ineffective erythropoiesis (n=35), hypoproteinaemia (n=2) or coagulopathy (n=2). The anaemic cats had a pretransfusion haematocrit of 5-20% (m [median]=13), and received one to six transfusions (m=1). The survival rates of the anaemic cats at 1 and 10 days after transfusion were 84 and 64%, respectively. None of the deaths appeared to be related to transfusion reactions. The major crossmatch, undertaken before 117 transfusions, was incompatible for eight cats. All except for one had previously been transfused. Lysis of transfused cells in six cases resulted in a less than expected haematocrit rise and an increase in serum bilirubin. Transient mild transfusion reactions were only noted in two cats during the second or third transfusion. In conclusion, with proper donor selection and appropriate compatibility screening, blood transfusions are well tolerated, appear effective, and may increase chances of survival.
