Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Commonalities in the classical, collapsibility and counterfactual concepts of confounding
1Department of Psychiatry, Mackenzie Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada. stephen.newman@ualberta.ca
Objectives:
Three definitions of confounding are available in the epidemiologic literature, namely, the classical, collapsibility, and counterfactual. The classical and collapsibility definitions are intuitively appealing but, especially in the case of the latter, there are shortcomings. The more recent counterfactual definition overcomes these limitations but at the cost of increased abstraction. One of the aims of this article is to demonstrate that under certain conditions the three definitions of confounding have key features in common.
Conclusions:
The counterfactual definition of confounding addresses the inherent shortcomings of the classical and collapsibility definitions, and forms the basis of innovative methods of data analysis.
More Related Videos
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Cause and Effect
Cognitive Dissonance