Related Experiment Videos
The Gini coefficient as a measure for understanding accrual inequalities in multicenter clinical studies
Anna-Bettina Haidich1, John P A Ioannidis
1Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
Objective:
Clinical sites participating in multicenter trials may have unequal performance in recruiting subjects. We propose using the Gini coefficient as a quantitative measure of site accrual inequalities.
Study Design And Setting:
We evaluated the relationship of this metric to other study characteristics across 166 clinical studies (27,865 subjects) conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group between 1986 and 1999.
Results:
Overall there was a modest recruitment inequality among clinical centers (mean Gini=0.33). In multivariate modeling, site accrual inequalities were higher when there was more protracted enrollment, and a larger number of sites and were lower in antiretroviral studies than other studies. In long-term studies, the site accrual inequality increased significantly over time (P=0.004). In efficacy trials, a higher Gini coefficient was associated with higher likelihood of the study results being statistically significant (P=0.010).
Conclusion:
The Gini coefficient may be easily and routinely incorporated in the description of the characteristics of a clinical study and may provide insights about its enrollment pattern.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies