Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Center-surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry.

Chris L E Paffen1, Susan F te Pas, Ryota Kanai

  • 1Psychonomics Division, Helmholtz Research Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.l.e.paffen@fss.uu.nl

Vision Research
|May 12, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026
Same author

A Japan-origin motivational framework for diversive and specific curiosity: development of the English version of the Japanese Epistemic Curiosity scale.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Reply to Rodríguez: a temporal over nasal visual field dominance during interocular competition as a mechanism for the visual unawareness of the nose.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Trade-offs between visual sampling and memory in stable and changing worlds.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Spatial statistical learning of task relevance, rather than stimulus prevalence, improves visual working memory recall.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Introducing Philosophy Corner.

Perception·2025
Same journal

Impact of crowding on visual appearance and performance in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Surrounding visual motion influences binocular rivalry. A surround grating moving in one direction enhances the dominance of the opposite motion direction in the center, suggesting complex visual processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Vision

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry describes the alternating perception when eyes receive dissimilar stimuli.
  • The dominance of rivalrous stimuli can be modulated by surrounding visual elements.
  • Understanding these modulations offers insights into visual processing pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how surrounding motion affects binocular rivalry of oppositely moving central gratings.
  • To determine if surround motion direction influences the dominance of central motion perception.
  • To explore the underlying neural mechanisms of these center-surround interactions in motion processing.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed oppositely moving gratings in each eye, inducing binocular rivalry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A surrounding grating, moving in the same direction as one of the central stimuli, was introduced.
  • Perceptual dominance of central motion directions was measured under various surround conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • A surrounding grating moving in the same direction as one central stimulus increased the dominance of the opposite motion direction in the center.
    • This effect was independent of which eye received the surround stimulus.
    • The results could not be explained by a single mechanism beyond binocular fusion.

    Conclusions:

    • Center-surround interactions significantly influence binocular rivalry dynamics.
    • The observed phenomenon suggests complex, multi-level processing in the visual motion pathway.
    • These findings point towards inhibitory and facilitatory interactions shaping motion perception.