Related Experiment Videos
Arsenic drinking water regulations in developing countries with extensive exposure.
Allan H Smith1, Meera M Hira Smith
1Arsenic Health Effects Research Program, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkley, CA 94720, USA. ahsmith@berkeley.edu
Toxicology
|May 13, 2004
Summary
Reducing arsenic in drinking water is crucial. High levels cause cancers, but developing nations may need to maintain a 50 microg/l standard due to complexities like malnutrition and smoking.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Toxicology
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Historical drinking water standards for arsenic have evolved, with the World Health Organization Guideline set at 10 microg/l in 1992.
- Epidemiological studies link long-term exposure to 500 microg/l arsenic in drinking water with increased cancer mortality, notably lung cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the complexities of setting drinking water arsenic standards, particularly in developing countries.
- To consider factors influencing arsenic risk, such as malnutrition and smoking, and their impact on public health strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical drinking water standards and epidemiological data on arsenic exposure and health outcomes.
- Analysis of synergistic effects between smoking and arsenic exposure on lung cancer incidence.
- Consideration of socio-economic factors and practical limitations in implementing water quality standards.
Main Results:
- A concentration of 500 microg/l arsenic in drinking water is associated with a significant risk of fatal internal cancers.
- Malnutrition and smoking may exacerbate arsenic-related health risks, particularly lung cancer.
- Stringent arsenic standards may hinder immediate solutions like shallow dugwells in developing nations.
Conclusions:
- A prudent public health approach necessitates reducing permissible arsenic concentrations in drinking water.
- Developing countries with high arsenic exposure may benefit from maintaining a 50 microg/l standard as an interim measure.
- Addressing co-factors like malnutrition and promoting smoking cessation are vital components of a comprehensive arsenic mitigation strategy.