Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interaction between visually and kinesthetically triggered voluntary responses.

M Flanders1, P J Cordo, J G Anson

  • 1Neurological Sciences Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97209, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|December 1, 1986
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does hypnotic susceptibility influence information processing speed and motor cortical preparatory activity?

Neuropsychologia·2019
Same author

Transformation from head- to shoulder-centered representation of target direction in arm movements.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Frames of reference for hand orientation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Gaze is driven by an internal goal trajectory in a visuomotor task.

The European journal of neuroscience·2013
Same author

Increased dynamic regulation of postural tone through Alexander Technique training.

Human movement science·2010
Same author

Haptic touch reduces sway by increasing axial tone.

Neuroscience·2010
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

This study explored how combined visual and kinesthetic stimuli trigger voluntary motor responses. Results suggest that both stimuli contribute to the response, sometimes leading to an overly large motor output due to inefficient sensory integration.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Voluntary motor responses can be triggered by various sensory inputs.
  • Understanding how combined sensory stimuli influence motor preparation and execution is crucial for fields like robotics and rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the combined effects of visual and kinesthetic stimuli on voluntary torque responses.
  • To determine whether combined stimuli lead to additive or exclusive response patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed voluntary elbow flexion torque responses to visual, kinesthetic, or combined stimuli.
  • Response latency and amplitude were analyzed for each stimulus condition.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both visual and kinesthetic stimuli alone elicited fast and accurate torque responses.
  • Combined stimuli resulted in response latencies determined by the earliest stimulus.
  • Response amplitude analysis indicated an additive effect, suggesting both stimuli contributed to the motor output.

    • Conclusions:

    • Combined visual and kinesthetic stimuli trigger voluntary responses additively, not exclusively.
    • The additive response can lead to an erroneously large amplitude, indicating inefficient integration of sensory information.