Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Controlling Parkinson's Disease With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: July 16, 2014
Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
Two models of reward summation were examined in 16 rats lever pressing for intracranial stimulation under fixed-interval (FI) reinforcement. The first model examined rate-frequency functions and the second model traded off frequency and train duration. The second model was selected to assess the effects of three drugs on reward summation. Both clonidine and pimozide inhibited FI self-stimulation, but pimozide's effect could not be distinguished from a performance deficit. Two amphetamine isomers facilitated self-stimulation in a manner suggesting enhanced reinforcement. The dextro isomer was four times more effective than the levo isomer to facilitate self-stimulation. This study shows that the combination of the FI schedule with a reward-summation model is well suited for evaluating the effects of drugs on self-stimulation. The advantages of this model are that inter-reinforcement intervals are separated, which minimizes priming and stimulation aftereffects, and more responding does not increase stimulation availability, thus eliminating rate-dependency effects.
More Related Videos
09:16A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025