Missed acute cardiac ischemia in the ED: limitations of diagnostic testing
Reena Duseja1, James A Feldman
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Insights
Accurately diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. This case series highlights how test limitations can lead to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment for patients with ACI.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- Acute cardiac ischemia (ACI), encompassing unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), presents a diagnostic challenge in emergency medicine (EM).
- Various diagnostic technologies exist to aid in ACI triage, but each has inherent limitations.
Observation:
- This case series examines scenarios where diagnostic adjuncts with unknown performance or overlooked test limitations contributed to the failure in appropriately triaging and treating ACI patients.
- Specific cases illustrate the risks of relying on single negative cardiac biomarkers, the limitations of negative exercise electrocardiographic stress tests (ETT), and the potential pitfalls of a negative coronary angiogram.
Findings:
- Reliance on a single negative cardiac biomarker set can be hazardous.
- A negative exercise electrocardiographic stress test (ETT) does not rule out acute cardiac ischemia.
- Even a negative coronary angiogram, considered the gold standard for symptomatic coronary artery disease, has limitations in specific clinical contexts.
Implications:
- Understanding and considering the limitations of diagnostic tests is crucial for accurate ACI diagnosis and management in the ED.
- Healthcare providers must be vigilant about potential diagnostic errors stemming from test limitations.
- Further research into optimizing diagnostic strategies for ACI in the ED is warranted.
Abstract:
Correctly identifying and appropriately triaging patients who present to the ED with the broad range of symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI: unstable angina pectoris [UAP] and acute myocardial infarction [AMI]) remains one of the greatest challenges in EM. Although a number of diagnostic technologies have been described to aid in this triage process, each of these tests or technologies has limitations. We report a case series in which either the use of adjuncts with unknown performance or tests with known but not considered limitations could have contributed to the failure to appropriately triage and treat patients with ACI. Each case illustrates different aspects of this clinical challenge. One case illustrates the hazards of reliance on a single set of negative cardiac biomarkers. The limitations of a negative exercise electrocardiographic stress test (ETT) are illustrated in the second case. Finally, the limitations of a negative coronary angiogram, the "gold standard" test for symptomatic coronary artery disease, are discussed. We review the literature on technologies to aid in the evaluation of patients who present to the ED with symptoms suggestive of ACI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and the T...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

