Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Property crime victims' decision to notify the police: social, cognitive, and affective determinants
Martin S Greenberg1, Scott R Beach
1Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA. greenber+@pitt.edu
Abstract:
Previous research suggests that 3 general processes underlie the decision of property crime victims to notify the police: One that is cognitively driven by reward/cost considerations, one that is affectively driven, and another that is socially driven. This study is the first to employ a community sample of crime victims to compare the 3 processes within a single study. Computer-assisted interviews were conducted with 422 property crime victims (n = 129 burglary, n = 293 theft) located via a random digit dialing procedure. Logistic regression analyses showed that each process independently accounted for a significant amount of the variance in victim reporting, and that there were no interactions among the three processes in predicting reporting. Of the 3 processes, social influence was the best predictor of reporting. Analysis of the affect-driven process showed that reporting was primarily a function of the level of fear rather than anger or the level of generalized arousal upon discovering the crime.
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Deindividuation
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory