Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity
Published on: June 12, 2016
Simulation studies on the effects of mobile-phase modification on partitioning in liquid chromatography
Collin D Wick1, J Ilja Siepmann, Mark R Schure
1Department of Chemistry and of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, USA.
Abstract:
Various driving forces have been suggested to explain retention and selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC). To provide molecular-level information on the retention mechanism in RPLC, configurational-bias Monte Carlo simulations in the Gibbs ensemble were carried out for model systems consisting of three phases: an n-hexadecane retentive phase, a mobile phase with varying water-methanol composition, and a helium vapor phase as reference state. Liquid n-hexadecane functions as a model of a hydrophobic stationary phase, and a wealth of experimental data exists for this system. Gibbs free energies for solute transfers from gas to retentive phase, from gas to mobile phase, and from mobile to retentive phase were determined for a series of short linear alkanes and primary alcohols. Although the magnitude of the incremental Gibbs free energy of transfer for a methylene segment is always larger for the gas- to retentive-phase transfer than the gas- to mobile-phase transfer, it is found that the partitioning of alkanes and alkyl tail groups is mostly affected by the changes in the aqueous mobile phase that occur when methanol modifiers are added. In contrast, the partitioning of the alcohol headgroup is sensitive to changes in both the n-hexadecane and the mobile phases. In particular, it is found that hydrogen-bonded aggregates of methanol are present in the n-hexadecane phase for higher methanol concentrations in the mobile phase. These aggregates strongly increase alcohol partitioning into the retentive phase. The simulation data clearly demonstrate that due to modification of the retentive-phase hydrocarbons by solvent components, neither the solvophobic theory of RPLC, advocated by Horvath and co-workers, nor the lipophilic theory of RPLC, advocated by Carr and co-workers, can adequately describe the separation mechanism of the hexadecane model system of a retentive phase studied here nor the more complex situation present in actual RPLC systems.
More Related Videos
08:56Quantitative Analysis of the Cellular Lipidome of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 8, 2020
09:26Cellular Lipid Extraction for Targeted Stable Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: November 17, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution
Chromatographic Methods: Classification
Chromatographic techniques are typically named by...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process: