Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A process model for evidence-based literature syntheses.

Dana N Rutledge1, Judith A DePalma, Mary Cunningham

  • 1California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA. drutledge1@cox.net

Oncology Nursing Forum
|May 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FIGO 2023 staging may result in overtreatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same author

Homologous recombination deficiency should be tested for in patients with advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer aged 70 years and over.

Gynecologic oncology·2024
Same author

Chronic Fatigue Predicts Hospital Nurse Turnover Intentions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2022
Same author

Impact of Affect Balance on Cognitive and Physical Function in Adults With and Without Fibromyalgia.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2021
Same author

Hospital Nurse Competency to Care for Patients With Behavioral Health Concerns: A Follow-Up Study.

Journal for nurses in professional development·2021
Same author

Knowledge and Attitudes of Maternity Nurses and Ancillary Team Members about Substance Addiction during Pregnancy and Postpartum.

MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing·2021

The Triad Model of Research Synthesis efficiently produces systematic literature reviews for healthcare decision-making. This resource-intensive process requires careful planning and adequate resources for successful implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Healthcare decision-making relies on synthesized evidence.
  • Systematic literature reviews are crucial for evidence-based practice.
  • Existing methods for research synthesis may be time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development and implementation of the Triad Model of Research Synthesis.
  • To establish a mechanism for producing systematic literature reviews.
  • To provide evidence for healthcare decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • The Triad Model involves four key steps: organizing, searching, critiquing, synthesizing, and writing the literature.
  • Development and implementation were tracked over one year (2002) using author recollections and team tracking forms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three triad teams synthesized research on dyspnea treatment, cancer sleep disturbances, and cancer-related fatigue.

    • Main Results:

    • The Triad Model systematically guides the research synthesis process.
    • Triad team members dedicated significant time, equivalent to full-time work, to synthesis projects.
    • Time allocation varied by team member role and synthesis phase.

    Conclusions:

    • The Triad Model is a productive, albeit resource-intensive, method for systematic reviews.
    • Adequate resource negotiation is essential before initiating a synthesis project.
    • The model is effective for developing evidence-based care guidelines when sufficient resources and motivated personnel are available.