Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning antecedents for anaphoric one.

Nameera Akhtar1, Maureen Callanan, Geoffrey K Pullum

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. nakhtar@ucsc.edu

Cognition
|May 19, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining and exploring the dynamics of parent-child interactions and children's causal reasoning at a children's museum exhibit.

Child development·2023
Same author

Still Infantilizing Autism? An Update and Extension of Stevenson et al. (2011).

Autism in adulthood : challenges and management·2023
Same author

Integrating autistic perspectives into autism science: A role for autistic autobiographies.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2022
Same author

Can 18-Month-Old Infants Learn Words by Listening In on Conversations?

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2021
Same author

Experiencing social connection: A qualitative study of mothers of nonspeaking autistic children.

PloS one·2020
Same author

Relations between parent-child interaction and children's engagement and learning at a museum exhibit about electric circuits.

Developmental science·2020
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study challenges the claim that infants possess innate syntactic knowledge, arguing against the poverty of the stimulus. The authors dispute the three empirical claims made by Lidz et al. regarding language acquisition.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The argument from the poverty of the stimulus posits that certain linguistic structures are too complex or rare to be learned solely from environmental input.
  • Lidz et al. (2003) presented experimental evidence suggesting infants possess innate syntactic knowledge, specifically concerning anaphoric 'one' in English.
  • This evidence was interpreted as substantiating the poverty of the stimulus argument in language acquisition.

Discussion:

  • This note critically examines the three empirical claims underpinning Lidz et al.'s (2003) argument.
  • The authors contest the interpretation of the experimental data and the scope of the evidence available to infants.
  • A central point of contention is the learnability of the specific syntactic feature (anaphoric 'one') discussed by Lidz et al.

Related Experiment Videos

Key Insights:

  • The learnability of complex syntactic rules, such as the antecedent assignment for anaphoric 'one', is re-evaluated.
  • The study disputes the claim that the necessary evidence for learning this feature is too rare to be encountered by infants.
  • Alternative explanations for the observed infant behavior are suggested, challenging the innate grammar hypothesis.

Outlook:

  • Further experimental research is needed to clarify the extent of infants' syntactic knowledge and the mechanisms of language acquisition.
  • This critique prompts a re-evaluation of the poverty of the stimulus argument in the context of empirical linguistic data.
  • The findings encourage a nuanced understanding of the interplay between innate predispositions and environmental factors in child language development.