Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure.

Gordon D Logan1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. gordon.logan@vanderbilt.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|May 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Order is ordinal in serial memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

It was 40 years ago today: Reflections "On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method" by Logan et al. (1984).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

The power of many: The role of global matching in the episodic flanker compatibility effect.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

The power of one: A single flanker produces compatibility effects in the episodic flanker task.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

The task span procedure measures how many tasks people can perform sequentially. Studies found task span is similar to memory span, with no trade-off between task storage and switching, supporting some executive control theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • The executive control system manages cognitive resources, including task switching and working memory.
  • Understanding the limits of task performance is crucial for optimizing human-computer interaction and cognitive load management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the 'task span procedure' as a measure of cognitive capacity.
  • To determine the relationship between task span, memory span, and executive control functions.
  • To explore factors influencing task span, such as practice and task switching.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using the task span procedure, where participants recalled and performed tasks on stimuli.
  • Task span was compared to traditional memory span in practiced and unpracticed participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Long-term memory retrieval and the effect of task switching frequency were examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Task span showed little difference compared to memory span across experiments.
    • Practice with consistent or varied lists did not significantly alter task span.
    • The number of task switches had minimal impact on task span performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that cognitive storage and task switching may not involve a direct trade-off.
    • Results support certain models of executive control while challenging others.
    • The task span procedure offers a valuable method for assessing cognitive control capabilities.