Therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia

Therapeutic angiogenesis offers promise as a novel treatment for ischemic heart disease, particularly for patients who are not candidates for current methods of revascularization. The goal of treatment is both relief of symptoms of coronary artery disease and improvement of cardiac function by increasing perfusion to the ischemic region. Protein-based therapy with cytokines including vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor demonstrated functionally significant angiogenesis in several animal models. However, clinical trials have yielded largely disappointing results. The attenuated angiogenic response seen in clinical trials of patients with coronary artery disease may be due to multiple factors including endothelial dysfunction, particularly in the context of advanced atherosclerotic disease and associated comorbid conditions, regimens of single agents, as well as inefficiencies of current delivery methods. Gene therapy has several advantages over protein therapy and recent advances in gene transfer techniques have improved the feasibility of this approach. The safety and tolerability of therapeutic angiogenesis by gene transfer has been demonstrated in phase I clinical trials. The utility of therapeutic angiogenesis by gene transfer as a treatment option for ischemic cardiovascular disease will be determined by adequately powered, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II and III clinical trials. Cell-based therapies offer yet another approach to therapeutic angiogenesis. Although it is a promising therapeutic strategy, additional preclinical studies are warranted to determine the optimal cell type to be administered, as well as the optimal delivery method. It is likely the optimal treatment will involve multiple agents as angiogenesis is a complex process involving a large cascade of cytokines, as well as cells and extracellular matrix, and administration of a single factor may be insufficient. The promise of therapeutic angiogenesis as a novel treatment for no-option patients should be approached with cautious optimism as the field progresses.