Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Programming precision in repetitive tapping.

D Glencross1, N Barrett

  • 1Cognition and Performance Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Flinders University of Southern Australia, Bedford Park.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|June 1, 1983
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ferroelastic Twin Angles at the Surface of CaTiO_{3} Quantified by Photoemission Electron Microscopy.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Human exposure to diesel exhaust induces CYP1A1 expression and AhR activation without a coordinated antioxidant response.

Particle and fibre toxicology·2023
Same author

The use and effect of video game design theory in the creation of game-based systems for upper limb stroke rehabilitation.

Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering·2019
Same author

Chemistry of resistivity changes in TiTe/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> conductive-bridge memories.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Surface Proximity Effect, Imprint Memory of Ferroelectric Twins, and Tweed in the Paraelectric Phase of BaTiO

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Raman signatures of ferroic domain walls captured by principal component analysis.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2017
Same journal

Preferential Cup Size and End-State Comfort in Children.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Tapping blind allows faster movements by relying on motor programs, though visual feedback improves accuracy by adjusting to target width. This study compares blind and visual tapping performance.

Area of Science:

  • Motor control and human movement science.
  • Cognitive psychology and human-computer interaction.

Background:

  • The Fitts' tapping paradigm is a standard method for evaluating human motor control.
  • Understanding the interplay between motor programming and visual feedback is crucial for designing effective interfaces and rehabilitation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare movement time and accuracy in blind versus visually guided repetitive tapping tasks.
  • To investigate rapid aiming movements under motor program control versus visually guided control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Fitts' tapping paradigm with both blind (motor program control) and visual (visual feedback) conditions.
  • Subjects performed repetitive tapping tasks, with movement amplitude and target specifications recorded.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Subjects replicated amplitude specifications in the blind condition, but effective target width remained constant, not reflecting specified width.
  • Faster response times were observed during blind tapping compared to visual tapping.
  • Accuracy, as indicated by effective target width, was not modulated by specified target width in the blind condition.

Conclusions:

  • Motor program control, as seen in blind tapping, allows for rapid movements but may not adapt to target size variations.
  • Visual feedback plays a significant role in refining aiming movements, allowing for adjustments based on target specifications.
  • The findings suggest that movement speed in blind tapping is related to the intended force output for a given amplitude, highlighting the distinct control mechanisms at play.