Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling
Published on: April 3, 2026
Early continuity of care and immunization coverage
Matilde Irigoyen1, Sally E Findley, Shaofu Chen
1Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. mi5@Columbia.edu
Insights
Maintaining consistent care with a child's initial healthcare provider significantly boosts immunization rates. Early and continuous engagement with a medical home is crucial for ensuring children stay up-to-date on vaccinations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Continuity of care is vital for consistent health management.
- Understanding its impact on childhood immunization is essential for public health initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between continuity of care at the initial source and immunization coverage in young children.
- To determine if exclusive use of the initial provider impacts immunization rates.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study design was employed with 641 children under 3 months old.
- Data were collected from medical records and the New York City Department of Health Citywide Immunization Registry.
- Immunization status was assessed as cumulative, age-appropriate, and up-to-date at 18 months (UTD18).
Main Results:
- Less than half (46%) of children maintained continuity of care at their initial provider by 18 months.
- Children using other providers alongside their initial source had higher immunization rates.
- Continuity of care showed a threshold effect starting at 12 months, significantly increasing the likelihood of being up-to-date on immunizations.
Conclusions:
- Continuity of care at the initial source positively impacts immunization coverage, even with supplementary care elsewhere.
- Interventions encouraging sustained use of a medical home for the first two years are recommended to improve vaccination rates.
Objective:
We examined the relationship between early and exclusive continuity of care at the initial source of care and immunization coverage.
Methods:
We used a cohort study design with 641 randomly selected children initiating care before 3 months and making 2 or more visits to an inner-city practice network. We used 2 complementary data sources: medical records and the New York City Department of Health Citywide Immunization Registry. Immunization measures were cumulative age appropriate and up-to-date at 18 months (UTD18).
Results:
There was a gradual attrition from the initial source of care. By 18 months, less than half the children (46%) remained in care. Regardless of continuity, nearly half (42%) had used other immunization providers. The initial source of care contributed most immunizations (89%-94%); however, across all levels of continuity, children who also used other providers had higher immunization rates. We found a threshold effect of continuity beginning at 12 months: children in care from 12 to 14 months were 17.5 times more likely to be UTD18 than those in care less than 6 months. Each additional period in care increased the time remaining current with immunizations. Among children UTD18, 88% were in care at 11 months compared with 38% among those not UTD18, a 50% difference.
Conclusions:
Continuity of care at the initial source of care had a significant and lasting impact on immunization coverage, even if not used exclusively. Interventions promoting continued use of the medical home over the first 2 years of life may help improve immunization coverage.
Related Concept Videos
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Smallpox
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
