Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental differences in response processing.

J E Clark1

  • 1University of Maryland, MD, USA.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|September 1, 1982
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breech Presentations.

The Southern medical record·2022
Same author

An innovative antimicrobial stewardship programme for children in remote and regional areas in Queensland, Australia: optimising antibiotic use through timely intravenous-to-oral switch.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance·2021
Same author

Polymerase chain reaction for human parechovirus on blood samples improves detection of clinical infections in infants.

Molecular biology reports·2019
Same author

The impact of duration on effectiveness of exercise, the implication for periodization of training and goal setting for individuals who are overfat, a meta-analysis.

Biology of sport·2017
Same author

Developmental co-ordination disorder in socially disadvantaged Brazilian children.

Child: care, health and development·2014
Same author

The role of resistance training for treatment of obesity related health issues and for changing health status of the individual who is overfat or obese: a review.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2014
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Younger children show slower response decisions in tasks requiring spatial stimulus-response compatibility compared to adults. This age-related difference in cognitive processing was specific to compatibility, not task difficulty.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reaction time tasks are crucial for understanding cognitive processing speed.
  • Spatial stimulus-response compatibility influences decision-making efficiency.
  • Developmental differences in cognitive control are well-documented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age-related differences in processing response decisions.
  • To examine the impact of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time across age groups.
  • To compare cognitive performance in kindergartners, fourth graders, and adults.

Main Methods:

  • A two-choice reaction time task was employed.
  • Spatial stimulus-response compatibility was manipulated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was assessed across three age groups: kindergartners, fourth graders, and adults.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant age-related effects were observed in reaction time performance.
    • Younger children exhibited disproportionately longer processing times under incompatible stimulus-response conditions.
    • No similar age-related differences were found when response discriminability was varied.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial stimulus-response compatibility poses a greater processing challenge for younger children compared to adults.
    • Cognitive processing of response decisions is influenced by developmental stage and stimulus-response mapping.
    • The findings highlight age-specific modulations in cognitive control and decision-making.