Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Comments on "The effects of leader-member exchange and differential treatment on work unit commitment":
1University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA. yexu@unlserve.unl.edu
Abstract:
Van Breukelen, Konst, and van der Vlist in 2002 examined how members' perceptions of differential treatment from the leader affect the relationship between Leader-Member exchange and work unit commitment. This paper offers commentary, with specific focus on the judgment call for examining continuous effects across all levels of differential treatment. To justify the role of differential treatment as a neutralizer that weakens the influence of Leader-Member exchange on work unit commitment, the regression coefficients of work unit commitment on Leader-Member Exchange should be examined continuously with discriminable differential treatment. As a caution against using "neutralizer" based on the research results presented, "moderator" is suggested as the more appropriate descriptor of the role that differential treatment played. Also, the nature of the interaction between Leader-Member exchange quality and work unit commitment is explored, suggesting research should focus more on the main effects.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Social Loafing
Halo Effect
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Impact of Individuals on a Group