Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Analyzing the aesthetic impressions of alexithymic Japanese students
Miho Suzuki1, Jiro Gyoba, Michiko Kano
1Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8576, Japan. suzukim@sal.tohoku.ac.jp
Abstract:
We investigated the association between alexithymic tendencies as measured by the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the characteristics of aesthetic impressions for words and drawings. Impressions were measured using the semantic differential technique in three groups of Japanese students (High scores n = 31, Moderate scores n = 40, and a Control group n = 182) who were presented only words (Word condition), only drawings (Drawing condition), or pairs comprising one word plus one drawing that represented the same emotional categories (Drawing/Word condition). In a factor analysis on the data from participants, three factors (Evaluation, Activity, and Potency) were extracted. Based on the factor scores, the distances among the three conditions were calculated for each of the groups. For Potency, significant group differences were found between the Drawing/Word and other conditions. In the High-scoring alexithymia group, in particular, the Potency impressions based on tactile sensation, e.g., soft-hard, blunt-sharp, were amplified regardless of stimulus condition. These results are discussed in the context of somatosensory amplification associated with alexithymia and the difficulty of distinguishing between emotion and somatic sensations.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Esteem and Culture
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Surveys