Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating <sup>19</sup>Focused Screening with Make-On-Demand Chemical Spaces for Enhanced Fragment Follow-Up.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

Targeting Multiple KRAS Mutations with High-Affinity Macrocyclic Inhibitors: From Discovery to Preclinical Validation.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Correction: Dynamic conformational equilibria in the active states of KRAS and NRAS.

RSC chemical biology·2026
Same author

Fragment-based discovery enables direct targeting of the melanoma oncogene MITF.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Identification and characterization of binders to a cryptic and functional pocket in KRAS.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

GENEOnet: a breakthrough in protein binding pocket detection using group equivariant non-expansive operators.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
10:01

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach

Published on: June 23, 2026

Assessment of docking poses: interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations.

Romano T Kroemer1, Anna Vulpetti, Joseph J McDonald

  • 1Computational Sciences, Pharmacia Italia, Pfizer Group, Viale Pasteur 10, 20014 Nerviano, Milan, Italy. romano.kroemer@pharmacia.com

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
|May 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary

This study compared six molecular docking programs, finding that assessing key protein-ligand interactions (IBAC) is more meaningful for accuracy than simple RMS deviation, especially when discrepancies arise.

More Related Videos

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
10:01

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach

Published on: June 23, 2026

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Molecular docking is crucial for predicting ligand-protein binding modes.
  • Accurate pose prediction is essential for rational drug design.
  • Existing evaluation metrics may not fully capture binding accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of six popular docking programs.
  • To compare two distinct methods for assessing docking pose accuracy: RMSD and interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC).
  • To determine the most meaningful metric for evaluating docking performance.

Main Methods:

  • Six docking programs (FlexX, GOLD, ICM, LigandFit, DOCK, QXP) were used to predict ligand binding poses.
  • Pose accuracy was assessed using Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) from crystal structures.
  • Pose accuracy was also evaluated using interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) by comparing key interactions.

Main Results:

  • Significant discrepancies were observed between RMSD-based and IBAC classifications for several docking programs.
  • In cases of disagreement, IBAC provided a more accurate reflection of the experimental binding mode.
  • IBAC proved more meaningful for assessing the true docking accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) is a more reliable measure of molecular docking accuracy than RMSD alone.
  • Drug discovery efforts should consider IBAC for more robust evaluation of docking program performance.
  • Further refinement of docking pose evaluation metrics is warranted.