Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Use of a Low-flow Digital Anesthesia System for Mice and Rats
Published on: September 7, 2016
Effects of anesthetics on systemic hemodynamics in mice
Ben J A Janssen1, Tijl De Celle, Jacques J M Debets
1Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Universiteit Maastricht, PO Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands. B.Janssen@farmaco.unimaas.nl
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the systemic hemodynamic effects of four commonly used anesthetic regimens in mice that were chronically instrumented for direct and continuous measurements of cardiac output (CO). Mice (CD-1, Swiss, and C57BL6 strains) were instrumented with a transit-time flow probe placed around the ascending aorta for CO measurement. An arterial catheter was inserted into the aorta 4 or 5 days later for blood pressure measurements. After full recovery, hemodynamic parameters including stroke volume, heart rate, CO, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and total peripheral resistance were measured with animals in the conscious state. General anesthesia was then induced in these mice using isoflurane (Iso), urethane, pentobarbital sodium, or ketamine-xylazine (K-X). The doses and routes of administration of these agents were given as required for general surgical procedures in these animals. Compared with the values obtained for animals in the conscious resting state, MAP and CO decreased during all anesthetic interventions, and hemodynamic effects were smallest for Iso (MAP, -24 +/- 3%; CO, -5 +/- 7%; n = 15 mice) and greatest for K-X (MAP, -51 +/- 6%; CO, -37 +/- 9%; n = 8 mice), respectively. The hemodynamic effects of K-X were fully antagonized by administration of the alpha(2)-receptor antagonist atipamezole (n = 8 mice). These results indicate that the anesthetic Iso has fewer systemic hemodynamic effects in mice than the nonvolatile anesthetics.
Insights
Isoflurane anesthesia showed the fewest systemic hemodynamic effects in mice compared to other agents. This study compared isoflurane, urethane, pentobarbital, and ketamine-xylazine anesthesia in mice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Anesthesiology
- Laboratory Animal Science
Background:
- Accurate measurement of systemic hemodynamic effects is crucial for understanding anesthetic impacts in preclinical research.
- Mice are a common model organism, necessitating well-characterized anesthetic protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the systemic hemodynamic effects of four common anesthetic regimens in mice.
- To evaluate cardiac output (CO) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) under different anesthetics.
Main Methods:
- Mice (CD-1, Swiss, C57BL6) were surgically instrumented for continuous CO and arterial blood pressure monitoring.
- Hemodynamic parameters were measured in conscious mice before inducing anesthesia with isoflurane (Iso), urethane, pentobarbital sodium, or ketamine-xylazine (K-X).
Main Results:
- All anesthetics decreased MAP and CO compared to the conscious state.
- Isoflurane (Iso) exhibited the smallest decrease in MAP (-24%) and CO (-5%).
- Ketamine-xylazine (K-X) showed the most significant reduction in MAP (-51%) and CO (-37%), which was reversible with atipamezole.
Conclusions:
- Isoflurane has the least impact on systemic hemodynamics among the tested anesthetics in mice.
- Nonvolatile anesthetics like pentobarbital and ketamine-xylazine cause more pronounced hemodynamic alterations.
- Anesthetic choice significantly influences cardiovascular parameters in mouse models.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Stages of General Anesthesia

