Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.

Michel Labrecque1, Caroline Dufresne, Mark A Barone

  • 1Clinical and Evaluative Research Unit Saint-François D'Assise Hospital, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, Canada G1L 3L5. michel.labrecque@mfa.ulaval.ca

BMC Medicine
|May 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial comment on "Post Vasectomy Semen Analysis Completion in Clinic-Based Versus Mail-In Testing".

Urology·2026
Same author

Pilot-scale evaluation of native plant-based constructed wetland performance in a cold climate.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2026
Same author

Unexpected profiles in vasectomy demand during a national campaign in Bolivia: cross-sectional study and associations in age, number of children, and motivations for seeking vasectomy.

Contraception and reproductive medicine·2026
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and Complications of Vasectomy With Fascial Interposition Without Mucosal Cautery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Vasectomy: AUA Guideline (2026) Part I.

The Journal of urology·2025

No-scalpel vasectomy is the safest surgical approach for vas isolation, reducing complications. Combining fascial interposition (FI) with cautery offers the highest occlusive effectiveness for vasectomy.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Contraception

Background:

  • Vasectomy employs diverse surgical techniques for isolation and occlusion.
  • Assessing techniques for optimal occlusive and contraceptive effectiveness and complication rates is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare surgical techniques for vasectomy.
  • To determine if specific vas isolation or occlusion methods improve outcomes and reduce complications.

Main Methods:

  • Searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other sources for comparative vasectomy studies (1966-2003).
  • Two independent reviewers screened 2,058 titles/abstracts, retrieving 219 full reports.
  • Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, categorizing techniques into isolation, occlusion, and combined methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No-scalpel vasectomy significantly reduces surgical complications (hematoma, infection) compared to incisional techniques.
  • Fascial interposition (FI) enhances the occlusive effectiveness of ligation and excision.
  • FI combined with cautery of the vas lumen demonstrates the highest occlusive effectiveness, even with an open testicular end.

Conclusions:

  • No-scalpel vasectomy is the safest method for vas isolation.
  • Fascial interposition (FI) improves vasectomy effectiveness beyond simple ligation and excision.
  • Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to evaluate specific occlusion techniques.