Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interferences in hormone immunoassays.

George G Klee1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. klee.george@mayo.edu

Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
|May 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective validation of microseminoprotein-β added to the 4Kscore in predicting high-grade prostate cancer in an international multicentre cohort.

BJU international·2020
Same author

Kallikrein markers performance in pretreatment blood to predict early prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis after radical prostatectomy among very high-risk men.

The Prostate·2019
Same author

Reference Intervals: Comparison of Calculation Methods and Evaluation of Procedures for Merging Reference Measurements From Two US Medical Centers.

American journal of clinical pathology·2018
Same author

Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2016
Same author

Interleukins 6 and 8 and abdominal fat depots are distinct correlates of lipid moieties in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women.

Endocrine·2016
Same author

Multiple calibrator measurements improve accuracy and stability estimates of automated assays.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2016

Immunoassays are robust, but interference can occur. Laboratories rely on clinician communication and specific tests to investigate potential immunoassay interference and ensure accurate results.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Immunoassays are widely used for diagnostic testing.
  • Potential interferences can compromise immunoassay accuracy.
  • Identifying interference before testing is not feasible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss common causes of immunoassay interference.
  • To outline strategies for investigating suspected interference.
  • To highlight the importance of laboratory-clinician communication.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common immunoassay interference types (cross-reactivity, heterophile antibodies).
  • Description of investigative techniques: dilutional linearity, spiked recovery, heterophile antibody blocking, alternate technology testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on post-analytical investigation triggered by clinical suspicion.
  • Main Results:

    • Competitive immunoassays are prone to cross-reactivity.
    • Immunometric assays frequently encounter heterophile antibody interference.
    • Investigative methods can help identify and confirm assay interference.

    Conclusions:

    • Immunoassays are generally reliable measurement systems.
    • Laboratories must depend on clinicians to flag potentially erroneous results due to interference.
    • Systematic investigation protocols are essential for managing immunoassay interference.