[Medical practice analysis in internal medicine: a national descriptive study]

This descriptive and epidemiological study was conducted in Mars 2002 in Internal Medicine in order to (1) participate in elaborating a White Book about the speciality, (2) analyse the post-university formation needs of the specialists in Internal Medicine.

A questionnaire was sent to all specialists in Internal Medicine listed on the ADELI file (n = 2155). For the first three patients seen in consultation and during hospital stay, questioned specialists had to mention the age, sex, origin, motive of the visit, nature of symptoms, complexity of the problem and the nature of the required abilities. They also had to precise the main diagnosis of all patients seen in the same day.

Three hundred and sixty answers have been received. Three hundred and thirty two were exploitable. Five thousand six hundred and eleven main diagnosis were listed. Fifteen percent of the questioned specialists did practise in other specialities than Internal Medicine. Orphaned diseases were the most common pathologies carried out in consultation (17%). Patients seen during their hospital stay suffered more frequently from infectious, haematological and malignant diseases. In 55% of the cases, patients were seen in second or third line after a visit to a general practitioner or another specialist. The abilities of the Internal Medicine specialist alone were sufficient in 70% of the cases to solve the problem. Complexity of the problem was evaluated by the specialists themselves at about 45/100 on an analogical scale.

This study inform the medical community about the type of patients treated by the specialists in Internal Medicine, precise the exact nature of their professional exercise and their real need in medical post-university formation.