Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bubbles and bypass: an update.

Mark Kurusz1, Bruce D Butler

  • 1University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0528, USA. mkurusz@utmb.edu

Perfusion
|May 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"This could be a good thing".

Perfusion·2024
Same author

What's new?

Perfusion·2023
Same author

Saving lives.

Perfusion·2023
Same author

Expanded content and gratitude.

Perfusion·2022
Same author

Efficacy and safety.

Perfusion·2021
Same author

What is going on?

Perfusion·2020
Same journal

Corrigendum to: "A comparison of continuous blood gas monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass LivaNova B-capta, terumo CDI 500, spectrum medical M4".

Perfusion·2026
Same journal

ROTEM versus conventional coagulation tests in evaluating coagulopathy and transfusion requirement in ECMO patients: A retrospective study.

Perfusion·2026
Same journal

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Perfusion·2026
Same journal

External validation of the population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in patients undergoing neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Perfusion·2026
Same journal

Hydrogen ion (pH) and gas behavior during deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: Physiology and clinical implications.

Perfusion·2026
Same journal

Safety of prolonged anticoagulation-free venovenous ECMO management beyond 72 hours in post-traumatic ARDS: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Perfusion·2026
See all related articles

Gaseous microemboli (GME) persist during cardiopulmonary bypass despite advances. Current techniques may worsen GME, impacting neurocognition, necessitating improved detection and elimination strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Gaseous microemboli (GME) are an inherent risk in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
  • While gross air embolism is reduced, GME elimination remains a challenge in open-heart procedures.
  • Excessive GME has been linked to adverse neurocognitive outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the challenges and advancements in eliminating GME during CPB.
  • To discuss the impact of newer CPB techniques on GME.
  • To explore emerging technologies for GME detection and characterization.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of GME in cardiopulmonary bypass.
  • Analysis of current perfusion system techniques and their effect on GME.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of Doppler monitoring and novel detection technologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Despite improvements, current CPB methods still pose risks for GME.
    • Some advanced techniques may inadvertently increase GME or cause complications.
    • Doppler monitoring is primarily a research tool for GME detection.

    Conclusions:

    • Total elimination of GME during CPB remains an objective.
    • Further research and technological development are needed to distinguish GME from other emboli and assess clinical significance.
    • Improved GME management is crucial for patient safety and neurocognitive outcomes in cardiac surgery.